In the past few weeks, I've read:
Orphan's Tales: In the Cities of Coin and Spice by Catherynne Valente
I read about half of it, actually, and didn't find it compelling enough to continue. As with the first
Orphan's Tales, I loved the worldbuilding and invention, and was in turn overwhelmed and delighted by the prose. The downfall of this book was that at some point, the frame story of the boy & the girl in the garden and Dinarzad became more interesting to me than the stories they were telling. I realized I was flipping through pages and pages just to read the next "In the Garden" section, and at that point I sent the book back to the library. Even marvelous invention pales in comparison to really compelling characters, and I just wasn't getting enough of what I wanted.
Summerland, by Michael Chabon
Before this, I'd read
The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay and most of
The Yiddish Policemen's Union and found them both interesting and well-written, but not especially squee-worthy.
I love
Summerland. It's a uniquely American fantasy book, right down to the bastardization of Ragnarok into "Ragged Rock" (because everyone knows Americans can't pronounce foreign words correctly) and the obsession with baseball. It's not the real America, of course, but it's the
true America: a hodgepodge splintered mass of five different mythos with a few unique elements thrown in (the antagonist is Coyote. The protagonist's allies are piskies. They're trying to stop Ragnarok from coming about. And so on) saved by a few plucky kids who aren't rich or supremely talented, but willing to go the distance and do the job. The characterization is excellent: quirky without being unbelievable, and the 12 year old kids come off, more or less, as 12 year old small-town kids.
Woven into the story is a theme of parents abandoning their children; just enough to be noticeably poignant, but so subtle that it didn't all click together until I was into the last fourth of the book. I'm looking forward to rereading it; I suspect the second time through I'll notice little elegances I didn't appreciate the first time round.
Wonder Boys, by Michael Chabon
This one didn't appeal to me quite as much; I finished it, but more out of a perverse desire to see what he was going to do with a dead snake and a tuba than anything else. The characters were all obsessed with drugs, sex, artistic inadequacy, academia and their own navels. I had a hard time finding anyone to sympathize with, and was mostly irritated by the protagonist-narrator.
Some books have idiot plots, where the characters are shoehorned into doing really stupid things for the sake of pushing the story forward with no real justification. This was not quite an idiot plot, because the characters did have justification for doing really stupid things; the problem is that the justification was "constantly running around on a mixture of booze, weed and prescription pills." Certainly, this is true to life (especially in a certain set of academia); I just don't really think it's that interesting.
Nonetheless, I finished it; it's well-written, if disagreeable.
Memoirs of a Nervous Illness, by Daniel Paul Schreber
This one is non-fiction, bought on a whim and finished over a span of 3 or 4 days. Although it's called "memoirs", it's actually a grand, delusional diatribe written by a German judge institutionalized towards the latter half of the 19th century, in which he lays out the "truth" about God, the nature of the soul and how magic/miracles work.
What really fascinated me was how complex and far-reaching his delusional system had become in order to reconcile his hallucinations and his conviction in his own sanity. One early passage talks about taking a walk in the garden with one of the asylum attendants, and seeing the face of God illuminate the sky. The attendant, Schreber notes, did not react to this astounding phenomenon; therefore, he concludes, the attendant must not be truly human, but a "fleeting-improvised-man" [a sort of energy-based simulacrum, that was created out of thin air in order to interact with Schreber].
Later on, he notes repeatedly that his claims may sound unorthodox, but based on the evidence of his senses and his experiences it must be admitted, even by the most negative of skeptics, that they were true. Even now and again he questions the validity of his experiences, but always reaches the conclusion that he was not hallucinating and isn't a madman, though he understand why other people might think so.
It's rather religious, dense and occasionally hard to follow, but recommended if you're interested in delusional systems, or in unreliable narrators.
Am now reading
The Anatomy of Melancholy, which will probably take me the rest of my life to finish, but is nonetheless seriously cool.